George Will: The Earth Doesn't Care What We Do to It
And, of course, the Earth does not care if man becomes extinct.
George Wills latest excursion into climate science (1) was inspired by the American Scholar which had on the cover “The Earth Doesn’t Care if You Drive a Hybrid” and Robert B. Laughlin’s essay inside “What the Earth Knows.” (2) George Will likes to look at things in terms of geologic times as it obscures the damage man is doing to the Earth. He summarizes Laughlin’s article as:
“What humans do to, and ostensibly for, the earth does not matter in the long run, and the long run is what matters to the earth. We must, Laughlin says, think about the earth’s past in terms of geologic time.”
George Will is also afraid that environmental regulations will inconvenience him, so he loved the quote from the article:
“Buy a hybrid, turn off your air conditioner, unplug your refrigerator, yank your phone charger from the wall socket—such actions will leave the end result exactly the same.”
I can imagine Mr. Will beaming as he was able to quote a Nobel Prize winning physicist, albeit in theoretical physics, who agreed with him. Yet, you might wonder, what will that “end result” be?
And, Laughlin says:
“Someday, all the fossil fuels that used to be in the ground will be burned. After that, in about a millennium, the earth will dissolve most of the resulting carbon dioxide into the oceans. But most models, even pessimistic ones, envision a thousand-year carbon dioxide pulse followed by glacially slow decay back to the pre-civilization situation.”
Oops! Wait. Do we want to return to “pre-civilization”? There must be more that Mr. Will missed. Oh yes, Mr. Will would never quote this:
“Carbon dioxide from the human burning of fossil fuel is building up in the atmosphere at a frightening pace, enough to double the present concentration in a century. This buildup has the potential to raise average temperatures on the earth several degrees centigrade, enough to modify the weather and accelerate melting of the polar ice sheets. Governments around the world have become so alarmed at this prospect that they’ve taken significant, although ineffective, steps to slow the warming. “
Laughlin offers a reason for the ineffectiveness:
“Experts are little help in the constant struggle in this conversation to separate myth from reality, because they have the same difficulty, and routinely demonstrate it by talking past each other. Respected scientists warn of imminent energy shortages as geologic fuel supplies run out. Wall Street executives dismiss their predictions as myths and call for more drilling. Environmentalists describe the destruction to the earth from burning coal, oil, and natural gas. Economists ignore them and describe the danger to the earth of failing to burn coal, oil, and natural gas. “
He left out columnists like Mr. Will who help spread the myths and some of our politicians who spread misinformation and refuse to take timely action – while somehow finding time to take large donations from those who are profiting from the status quo.
Laughlin goes on:
”And the damage to the environment is exacerbated by the real problem, which is human population pressure generally – overharvesting, habitat destruction, pesticide abuse, species invasion, and so forth. Slowing man-made extinctions in a meaningful way would require drastically reducing the world’s human population. That is unlikely to happen”.
So, Robert Laughlin says that the Earth will likely get warmer, the oceans more acidic, and we will exhaust our fossil fuel supplies – and then the Earth will return to the equilibrium upset by man’s activities. Man’s effect will be but a mere blip in the geological history of the Earth. The Earth will not care if we return to pre-civilization or even if man becomes extinct. The only lasting change we may leave in Geologic time may be the loss of the species we take with us. Still, shouldn’t we try to preserve civilization and as many species as we can? Especially, ours?
(c) 2010 J.C. Moore
(1) http://www.newsweek.com/2010/09/12/george-will-earth-doesn-t-care-what-is-done-to-it.html?gt1=43002
(2) http://www.theamericanscholar.org/what-the-earth-knows/
Tags: Acidic Oceans, Amerian Scholar, carbon emissions, fossil-fuels, George Will, global Warming, human overpopulation, politicians, pre-civilization, Robert Laughlin, species extinctions
Posted on October 22nd, 2010 at 11:19 am
Hi, to start with I want to tell you that I follow your blog. Great post, I totally agree with you. Have a great day mate.
Posted on November 3rd, 2010 at 2:04 am
We’d a way to try a completely different type of jumperoo while staying in family members, plus it purely would not compare! The particular Rainforest Jumperoo could be very great, and then the past assistance plan gives it loads of jump place whereas nonetheless keeping it all tremendously secure. Different extras may very well be revoked family pets, your turning padded hold, as well as good sized quantities of products along the outside receptacle within the jumperoo. Most people viewed much of our boy’s information dexterity increase every day while he found out to manipulate all the animals.
Posted on November 3rd, 2010 at 3:23 am
Do you have an opinion on the article?
Posted on February 28th, 2011 at 11:45 am
Of course nature does not care what we do to it. Planet earth does not have a consciousness and does not care if we live on it or not. But we care if we are alive or not. If we don’t take care for the house we live in, the house cannot support us. When a house is ruined, the house does not care, but the residents care.
The earth will recover over a long period of time, but we may not be here to enjoy it. What does it matter to us if the planet earth continues to recover.. if we have all perished? We care about our lives on this planet, therefore we care about the health of the earth. We care about earth because it is our home. We must take care of this planet in order to live a healthy suitable for life all people and other species (fish, birds, wildlife, insects). The people on this planet are affected by what we do to this planet. We must make choices for what is good for our planet in sustaining our life on it.
It was stated in this article that earth does not care if we drive a hybrid, but it matters to us because it affects our air quality, natural resources (energy, water, gas) and overall health so we (more generations to come) can live longer on this planet.
Learning from geological times is that dinosaurs perished probably from an environmental disaster which was not their fault. Yet they perished and it took earth millions of years to come up with new adapted life forms including humans. If we do not take care of our planet and ruin the environment, we suffer and may perish and earth will continue without humans or any form of life until new life forms are created, which may not be same as us. So it does matter how we take care of our planet while we have the chance to live on it. If we parish, who cares about the next life forms. We will be like the dinosaurs who never came back to this planet again. New life forms that may come after our environment can no longer support our lives may very well be very different from us. In this sense, we will be the dinosaurs. But we still have a chance and choice to prevent ourselves from becoming the dinosaurs. So protecting our environment does matter, so driving a hybrid do matter to us but not to the earth. Of course the earth does not care.
Posted on February 28th, 2011 at 5:13 pm
Thank you for a well reasoned and accurate comment.